site stats
Welcome, register | help | log in

More CCHIT - The Conspiracy Continues...

Featured in:

CCHIT released names of 11 more vendors with EMR products now certified by the commission. This should create more momentum for the certification.

Those conspirators...err...people at CCHIT have approved of more EMRs.

The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology approved 11
of the 17 ambulatory electronic health record products submitted in the latest
round of testing, Health IT Strategist reports. A total of 33
products now have received certification.

To be certified, ambulatory
EHR products must meet all of the more than 200 criteria for functionality,
security and interoperability. Vendors also must pay a $28,000 application fee.

The following new products received CCHIT certification:

  • ABELMed PM-EMR by ABELSoft;
  • AcerMed by AcerMed;
  • Avatar by Netsmart Technologies;
  • Bond Clinician EHR by Bond Technologies;
  • CareRevolution by EHS;
  • Medical Practice EMR by CPSI;
  • MediNotes e by MediNotes;
  • MedPlexus EHR by MedPlexus;
  • Noteworthy EHR by Noteworthy Medical Systems;
  • PrimeSuite by Greenway Medical Technologies; and
  • Sunrise Ambulatory Care by Eclipsys.

CCHIT also
certified ProPractica's Streamline MD as a privately labeled version of a
previously certified product, Health IT Strategist
reports.

The six vendors who submitted their products during the
Aug. 1 through Aug. 14 application period but did not receive certification
either withdrew their application, postponed inspection or failed to comply with
all of the CCHIT criteria, according to the commission. CCHIT does not disclose
the names of the products that do not receive certification

 The significance of this is that there are smaller companies on this list and all have been able to meet the requirements for certification.  Honestly, I hope that this quells the critics of CCHIT to some extent.  This body is a private/public board of people tagged to set standards for the definition of an EMR.  They are presently working on future standards with a roadmap to support the NIHN concept of flow between EMR and also to give Medicare a standard by which to create a differential pay structure.

Being on the list gives a serious advantage for a company, so those who are not yet on the list are doing everything they can to get their product in compliance.

Trackbacks (0)

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://trusted.md/trackback/20205

Comments (4)

Submitted by joseph on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 4:11am.

Greetings:

Looks like a lot of people of working on ensuring the interoperability:
Please read: http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57920.aspx

http://www.medsp.com/ehro/market_drivers/ehro_reg_inits.php

So now we have another certifying agency or verifying agency! You have a choice! (Oh! I that the correct word--agency- well whatever)

 

#2: EMR
Submitted by Gary Levin (not verified) on Fri, 01/26/2007 - 9:26am.

More good news about interoperability....But go to my web site and read my commentary about "non profits" and hospital interest in Southern California.

Gary L

Submitted by Prakash (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 1:34pm.

I think that there are two views points to be considered when strongly advocating the use of EMR in practices. For a Doctor it needs to easy to use and save time so that more time can be spend on the patient. Currently we have many vendors with different types of EMR that are so hard to use that it simply puts them off. I think healthcare technology companies need to develop product after regular interaction with doctors to ensure that they provide just what is required. At binaryspectrum we have developed our healthcare solutions after spending countless number of hours with doctors to ensure that its work flow is kept simple and intuitive. This is then followed up with a period of Beta testing in real time environment before it is offered as a product in the market.

Submitted by rpinto54 on Tue, 03/10/2009 - 12:23pm.

As a past user, administrator and now certified vendor I can speak to the issue of certification as it relates to work-flow functionality and it doesn't.  Certification is a good tool to create standards that allow for things like security and infrastructure technology and specific functions like e prescribing capability but it was never intended to review the usability of the product.  Most physicians want a product that will improve their work-flow and so they must really hunt for products that help them in that area. Certification does not guarantee improved work-flow.  If you would like to read more about the 10 ways to discourage EMR adoption read my blog.  The link is provided below.

http://trusted.md/referral/7472818c

Post new comment

[?]
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
[?]
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.

User login