Part of my job is to help clients resolve claims problems with their insurers. I have no actual “power” to get claims paid, but having been at this for almost 25 years, I’m pretty familiar with how “the game” is played, and (most of the time) know whom to call to get a problem resolved.
Which is all well and good for my clients, but what about their providers? Obviously, it’s not my place to resolve their problems (except indirectly), but it might be helpful to my clients (and potential clients) if I knew which carriers were better about paying their claims.
But how the heck would I know that, except anecdotally?
Well, now there’s an answer: athenahealth (they apparently prefer the lowercased version) is a successful claims-processing company based in Massachusetts. Recently, they studied the claims performance data for some 7,000 providers (large and small physician practices), to determine how carriers fared in timely and accurate claims payment.
The study tested for three broad “metrics:” Financial Performance, Administrative Performance, and Medical Policy Compliance. There were, of course, subsets in each of these categories, which combined to present a picture of how well carriers do in paying claims.
One caveat: athenahealth acknowledged that such a small sample (7,000 providers, and 5 million line items) “is not a statistically valid sample.” Still, it gives an insight into the dark underbelly of the process.
I’ll focus here on two general outcomes: overall ranking, and average number of days to pay a claim. In the former category, Humana won the Blue Ribbon, followed closely by (surprise!) Medicare. Perhaps unsurprisingly, WellPoint (aka Blue Cross) came in last. According to a WP spokescritter, the report “has absolutely no statistical significance.” Since the authors of the study had already acknowledged this, I can think of only one reason for such a statement.
In fairness, the study examined such a small percentage of WP’s claims that it’s probably not an unfair conclusion, but surely there’s a way to learn from the results.
Another significant measure is the number of days taken from the date of service to the date of payment. Humana won in this category, as well, while Champus/Tricare (the insurer for military families) came in dead last. I’m sort of sorry to see this: if a commercial carrier had done so, there might be market (or other) pressures to improve; it’s hard to see what kind of pressure could be brought to bear on the government’s own agency.
A couple parting thoughts.
The survey ranked WP first in one category: clear explanations of claim denials. Sometimes, it’s difficult to get an accurate assessment of why a given claim has been denied, so this is positive
I was surprised at how many providers “outsource” their billing. I suppose I shouldn’t be: that’s got to be a tremendous cost-center, and more effectively contracted out.
The results of the survey are available online, and are updated quarterly. It’s actually pretty cool, with interactive tools to see who ranks where, and how.
Be well.
Henry Stern, LUTCF is an independent insurance agent in Dayton, OH. A licensed Continuing Education instructor for Ohio and Kentucky, he has well over 20 years of experience in “the biz.” He blogs every day (or so it seems) at InsureBlog.
Most state DOI's have been enforcing "prompt payment" guidelines for a few years now. Here in GA a couple of carriers have been fined for slow payment with one carrier hit two years running.
Curiously, that same carrier was recently awarded the ASO contract for the state health plan.
Probably just a coincidence . . .
Seems that most people buy health insurance assuming they will never have a claim. Otherwise, why would they never buy a plan that has so little coverage as they do quite often.
Consumers routinely look for plans with low copays and low deductibles as if the $300 claim is going to do them in. Then they are caught by surprise when one of the big boys hits and suddenly they are out of pocket $10k or more.
I can understand situations such as happened with a client last year who had a diagnostic endoscopy and then questioned why the test was listed as a surgical procedure making it subject to the deductible and coinsurance. But I have difficulty with the individual, fortunately not a client of mine, who protested the $7k charge for air ambulance following an automobile wreck. He claimed he should not be responsible for the bill since he was not conscious to APPROVE the use of a life flight helicopter.
He also felt his carrier should pay more than the $500 allowance that was clearly spelled out in his policy.
My observation has been that most carriers get it right and pay on a timely basis once all the information is submitted. Most of the client complaints exist mostly because they fail to understand their policy.
Perhaps that is because most fail to even read their policy . . .
HIPAA makes it impossible for agents to do their job and run interference on claims, but that does not mean it is our job to sit on the sidelines and watch.
I wonder how many folks on those nameless web sites that quote rates have service personnel to assist in claims?