In a prior post, I examined the how empathy (i.e., the ability to put oneself in the shoes of another), which is often lacking from the healthcare reform debate, ought to be an essential ingredient in the decisions our country makes. My discussion about the need for greater empathy triggered a contentious debate between a man working in the insurance industry and myself.
Our heated debate are at the following two links:
- http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2009/07/empathy-taxes-personal-responsibility_27.html
- http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2009/08/empathy-taxes-personal-responsibility.html
We cover a wide variety of topics, including:
- Whether empathy is a good thing when it comes to healthcare
- If private insurance is better than a public plan
- Whether healthcare is a right
- The validity of claims by Wendell Potter--a health insurance PR exec turned whistleblower--who is speaking out against the underhanded tactics of the health insurance industry
- Capitalism, free market attitudes, and deregulation
- Whether high-value/cost-effective care is important and how to measure it
- Whether consumers should be the ones to judge if they received the best possible (i.e., most cost-effective) care
- Whether healthcare is a “system” or a bunch of unrelated systems
- And more.